“Alarmists are very lucky that there haven’t been any large eruptions in the last 15 years, because the depravity of their scam would be obvious to everybody” ~~ Steve Goddard
On April 14, 2014, former president, Mary Robinson stated global leaders and scientists have 20 years to save the planet, which means we roughly have until 2034/2035 before our planet is going to disappear.
Earth Day is near and in honor of “ED” I sincerely want to stress the “sky-will-fall if we don’t invest $400 billion or more per year” nonsense thrown around by our feathered, liberal friends.
Essentially what the government is advocating is that "cancer causes cigarette smoking."
Consequently, the politicians and our government have this all backwards as do the quaky scientists the government commissioned to scientifically quantify the myths and speculative climate control farce all at the expense of "we the people's" tax dollars.
THE GREENHOUSE EFFECT AND COWS
Regarding the greenhouse effect, although the majority worry about possible global warming from the additional carbon dioxide (CO2) we put into the atmosphere by mankind, the amount is roughly 80% of the 5% (or 4% of 100% CO2) with less than 1% (of 100%) coming from fossil fuel emissions.
Freedom Outpost” indicated that the largest producer of greenhouse gases from that 4% (80% of 5%) are from cow flatulence and belches and NOT FOSSIL FUELS. So what next? Is U.S.A. government going to KILL THE COWS?
WILL THE SKY FALL DUE TO CARBON DIOXIDE (CO2)?
Furthermore, even if we reduced the amount of CO2 by the U.S. that comes from cows (this does not count the rest of our world), it would have no impact at all on changing the forces of natural climate and atmospheric changes.
The Carbon Cycle and the Earth's Climate," our global climate would be significantly cooler even with no CO2 in the atmosphere. Source: The Carbon Cycle and Earth's Climate, Columbia University.
Unfortunately, what the politicians, celebrities, ultra-rich liberals want "we the people" to believe and to waste our $$$ on is that "our-sky-is-falling" and we can stop this only if we invest billions and trillions of dollars in the next few years (government never guarantees it will work).
Do you agree that we all need to examine why the government is so hell bent on heavily investing in these unsubstantiated climate control programs?
RICH KEEP GETTING RICHER, POOR KEEP GETTING POORER, AND THE MIDDLE CLASS IS ON THE BRINK OF EXTINCTION
Not surprisingly, the rich become richer, investors make tons of $$$, politicians stay in office for longer terms, etc., and they do not care if the program doesn't work. All this while "we the people's" taxes are spent on climate control programs that are not substantiated but since investments are made by government insiders, they continue to have inflated bank accounts.
Moreover, there is no proof that what these climate control companies are doing will actually be successful or have any substantial impact. Do you believe technology can win over Mother Nature?
Theoretically, the only math and science relevant is that the climate control quaks hired by our government are getting ultra rich, becoming million to billionaires all at the expense of "we the people’s" tax dollars.
Consider the growing wealth of Gore, Clinton, Pelosi, liberal celebrities, etc., (to mention a few) all emanating from our government’s climate control propaganda. All while “we the people” keep on getting less opportunity.
It’s not redistribution of wealth that is needed but redistribution of government expenditures that really matter.
Additionally, the tax rates consistently decrease as the rich get richer and middle class taxes increase as their wages decrease.
PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND RESPIRATION
The Carbon Cycle and the Earth's Climate" explains the outgassing as well as how photosynthesis works and how the majority of CO2 released is from natural elements (e.g., midocean ridges, volcanoes, rock, plants, trees, animal life, cows, man, etc. and not fossil fuel emissions).
Additionally, the article describes how photosynthesis and respiration are in continual opposing sides and will never balance out. It's not as if we can inject a needle with penicillin into the ground and alter our planet's climate.
Isn’t it about time that we stop putting our country into more debt over this absurdity thrown upon us at the expense of our tax dollars?
This is not to say that our country should not study sustainable development and environmental science concepts. Sustainabilty is integral for making better decisions for the future of our ecosystems and environment but it must be clearly thought out and planned in a much more organized, integrated scenario and at significantly lower costs. No individuals should be capitalizing on sustainability efforts period! The benefit of sustainability development is that it takes into account everything including social, economic, environment, and viability (meaning viability will guarantee the success of the program).
Do you agree we need to focus on real issues that matter? The government has been working on a backward equation (e.g., "cancer causes cigarette smoking") for several years and our deficit is growing exponentially. We will probably reach a $20 trillion dollar deficit before 2020.
Unequivocally, I hope this puts climate control expenditures into perspective. Our government cannot keep on wasting tax dollars on nonsensical climate control quack programs that simply do not work.
Disappointingly, the current government climate control programs add a few jobs (if any), go to family members, buddies, etc., and few insiders become rich at the expense of making "we the people" poor. The Columbia University article (http://www.columbia.edu/~vjd1/carbon.htm ) also describes real facts about the “Greenhouse Effect.”
Earth Day will be celebrating its 45th event (44 years) this coming April 22nd, and I have been supportive of Earth Day since it was first introduced back in 1970. I would not advocate that we all should ignore efforts to conserve energy, water, and recycle, as well as implement solar and alternate fuel. However, they need to become available for public use only when there is valid proof that our atmosphere will positively impact the world with significantly less dollars than current costs.
650 SCIENTISTS DISAGREE WITH A U.N. REPORT BY 52 SCIENTISTS
American Thinker reported that a Princeton University professor and former Director of Energy Research at the Department of Energy (1990-1993), presented some of his key findings on climate change and reported that 650 prominent international scientists, including both former and current IPCC participants, have challenged the claims about global warming made by the 52 scientists commissioned by U.N. panel's report. He also stated carbon dioxide (CO2), the compound singled out by the IPCC as a major contributor to global warming, has, in fact, a beneficial compound essential for life on earth.
On all accounts, this fact is valid proof that global warming had nothing to do with fossils fuel burning.
Obviously, wasting inordinate amounts of government time and money on climate control programs that bear no guarantee to significantly improve the earth's atmosphere is stupidity. Also, over the past 3 years the U.S. has spent nearly 8 billion dollars of "we the people's" tax monies in other countries for climate programs that we will never know outcomes or if the $$$ are going to the program.
Unfortunately, even if what these 52 scientists reported had any grain of validity, nothing we would do would ever generate a significant difference in our world's atmosphere.
Historically, our government and politicians have been wasting our tax dollars on programs that will have no impact on the forces of Mother Nature, have no proof or guarantee these programs will work, and it’s about time they focus on the more pressing issues.
WHERE HAVE ALL OUR TRILLIONS GONE?
Regrettably, our government spending is on the verge of increasing debt to $20 trillion before 2020. The government needs to focus on our economy, eliminating debt, improving employment, supply chain sustainability, reforming healthcare, our military, the injured, families of deceased military, mental health, hunger, homelessness, education, etc.
Additionally, as much as I respect and admire Ann Curry, the likes liberal NBC media, sorry to say, they are riddled with deception, nonsense and propaganda. Many are out of touch with what our country imperatively needs.
Do you think our government is intentionally silencing the hundreds of prominent atmospheric and climate scientists who oppose the existing global warming programs? Do you think climate control is a farce? Isn’t it time our country moves forward instead of backward?
♦Global Warming is a Farce, SteveGoddard, https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2013/01/31/global-warming-is-a-farce/
♦Columbia University, "The Carbon Cycle and the Earth's Climate," http://www.columbia.edu/~vjd1/carbon.htm
♦Barack Obama Admits the Farce of Global Warming Won’t Be Curbed by His Taxpayer Funded Climate Control Agenda, Freedom Outpost http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/01/barack-obama-admits-global-warming-wont-curbed-taxpayer-funded-climate-control-agenda/
♦We prove the farce of global warming, The Black Sphere, [VIDEO] http://theblacksphere.net/2014/2/global-warming-farce
♦The Farce of Global Warming, American Thinking, March 2009, http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/03/the_farce_of_global_warming.html
Please check out all the links in the resource section above and share this on your LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, and other social media networks you enjoy! Thanks!
Photos courtesy of Tom Eslinger and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., unless otherwise mentioned.
Visiting this blog frequently and sharing this with your social media and professional network is much appreciated. Thanks. All photos courtesy of Wikimedia unless otherwise indicated.